Trust Under Attack: A Desk-Study Playbook for Public Relations Crisis Prevention and Response in the Deepfake and Synthetic Media Era
Keywords:
crisis communication, synthetic media, trust repair, misinformation, authenticity, governance, incident responseAbstract
PR is moving into a synthetic media age where believable fake impersonation and mass-production of artificial audiovisual evidence can be manufactured and sold. The desk-study is a synthesis of 2021-2026 peer-reviewed literature, institutional reports, and quality case documentation to build a repeatable crisis prevention and response framework to PR professionals in the face of deepfakes and AI-generated misinformation. We combine: (1) practitioner evidence on crisis misinformation detection and response limitations; (2) governance changes towards disclosure, systemic risk, and provenance; and (3) trust restoration results of digital-crisis studies. Documentation of cases shows that attacks supported by deepfakes attack organizational processes with more and more reliance on social trust and communication networks than on technical infrastructure. We suggest a five-stage PR playbook: authenticity preparedness, quick verification and triage, open corrective communication, rebuilding trust in stakeholders, and building resilience after a crisis. The manuscript includes checklists, decision rules, and metrics that are consistent with ethical norms (disclosure, accountability, privacy safeguards) and equity (cross-lingual monitoring, vulnerability-aware communication). Limitations: The use of desk-study sources and the changes in the policies of platforms and AI tools.
References
Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. (2024). C2PA technical specification (Version 2.1). https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.1/specs/_attachments/C2PA_Specification.pdf
Dong, C., & van den Berg, M. (2025). Revisiting PR professionalism and ethics in the generative AI era through PR practitioners’ insights. Public Relations Review, 51(3), Article 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102582
European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
Farid, H. (2025). Mitigating the harms of manipulated media: Confronting deepfakes and digital deception. PNAS Nexus, 4(7), pgaf194. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf194
International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Detecting deepfakes and generative AI: Report on standards for AI watermarking and multimedia authenticity workshop. https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/t-ai4g-ai4good-2024-7/
Mehta, A. M., Liu, B. F., Tyquin, E., & Tam, L. (2021). A process view of crisis misinformation: How public relations professionals detect, manage, and evaluate crisis misinformation. Public Relations Review, 47(2), Article 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102040
Meta. (2024, April 5). Our approach to labeling AI-generated content and manipulated media. https://about.fb.com/news/2024/04/metas-approach-to-labeling-ai-generated-content-and-manipulated-media/
OECD. (2024). Facts not fakes: Tackling disinformation, strengthening information integrity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d909ff7a-en
PRMIA. (2025). The Arup deepfake fraud: When trust becomes an attack surface [Case study]. https://prmia.org/common/Uploaded%20files/eCyber/PRMIA%20Case%20study%20-%20ARUP.pdf
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2025). Digital News Report 2025. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025
Romero-Moreno, F. (2025). Deepfake detection in generative AI: A legal framework proposal to protect human rights. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, Article 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106162
Salem, O. M. A., Abudraz, A. M. M., Tharwat, W. A. K., Abdelhay, S., Alghoul, I., & Naouss, M. (2026). Public relations and reputation resilience: An applied study of Facebook’s crisis management strategies. Frontiers in Communication, 11, Article 1715094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1715094
Schiff, K. J., Schiff, D. S., & Bueno, N. S. (2025). The liar’s dividend: Can politicians claim misinformation to evade accountability? American Political Science Review, 119(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001454
Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D. (2024). Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis. International Journal of Information Management, 77, Article 102780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102780
TikTok. (n.d.). About AI-generated content. https://support.tiktok.com/en/using-tiktok/creating-videos/ai-generated-content
Twomey, J., Ching, D., Aylett, M. P., Quayle, M., Linehan, C., & Murphy, G. (2023). Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust? A thematic analysis of tweets that discuss deepfakes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0291668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291668
UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms: Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information through a multistakeholder approach. https://www.unesco.org/en/internet-trust/guidelines
Wittenberg, C., Epstein, Z., Péloquin-Skulski, G., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2025). Labeling AI-generated media online. PNAS Nexus, 4(6), pgaf170. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf170
World Economic Forum. (2025, February 19). Lessons learned from a $25m deepfake crime. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/02/deepfake-ai-cybercrime-arup/
X. (n.d.). Authenticity: Synthetic and manipulated media policy. https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/authenticity
YouTube. (2024). Disclosing use of altered or synthetic content. Google Help. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491
